🆚 Schema & Structured Data vs. SmartCrawl
- 📈 Schema & Structured Data is slightly more popular than SmartCrawl.
- 🌍 Schema & Structured Data is more popular in France, Australia, and Spain.
- 🌎 SmartCrawl is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
Type
About
Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP is a WordPress plugin that adds Schema.org structured data and Google Rich Snippets markup to websites.
It supports more than 15 schema types, conditional rules for applying markup to specific pages, Google review markup, custom post types, and integrations with
WooCommerce and bbPress.
SmartCrawl is a WordPress SEO plugin that analyzes content and automates on-page optimization to improve search visibility and indexing.
It provides real-time content and keyword analysis, automatic XML sitemap generation, customizable meta titles and descriptions, schema markup with a schema builder, and tools such as 301 redirects, breadcrumbs, and social metadata including
Open Graph and
Twitter Cards.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 site, 50 reviews) $99/year
(1 sites, 150 reviews) $149/year
(25 sites, 250 reviews) $299/year
(unlmited sites, 500 reviews) $499/year
(unlmited sites, 500 reviews) $999
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Spain in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Italy in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Brazil in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in South Africa in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Switzerland in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Canada in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Brazil in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the Czech Republic in the SEO category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Schema & Structured Data

