🆚 BitNinja vs. Imperva WAF

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Security tool
Bot mitigation technology

About

BitNinja is a server security suite with a centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered Linux malware scanner, IP reputation, WAF, and spam detection.

Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots. It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.

Headquarters

Debrecen, Hungary
San Mateo, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️For servers with up to 2 CPU cores and 2MB RAM
Depends on server specs and user count$5+/month
Free version ❌Free 30-day trial
SecureSphere WAF$7,000+/year

Categories

Security › Rank #10
Bot Mitigation › Rank #24
Bot Mitigation › Rank #3
Spam Protection › Rank #13

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Imperva WAF bot mitigation technology is 77 times more popular than BitNinja.
Total websites

Market share

Bot Mitigation

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Imperva WAF is more popular than BitNinja in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Spain
Australia
France
Canada
Italy
Germany
New Zealand

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Imperva WAF is more popular than BitNinja in all market segments.
Business
Sports
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Health
Government/Military
Entertainment
Travel

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
b4watch.com
#46,231
#47,366
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,009
#1,156
#1,283
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.