🆚 Cloudinary vs. EWWW Image Optimizer
- 📈 EWWW Image Optimizer is noticeably more popular than Cloudinary.
- 🌎 EWWW Image Optimizer is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Cloudinary is more popular in Indonesia, India, and Norway.
Type
About
Cloudinary is a cloud-based image and video API platform that provides tools for uploading, managing, transforming, optimizing, and delivering digital media assets.
It offers automatic image and video optimization, on-the-fly transformations through URL parameters, AI-based features such as background removal and object detection, adaptive bitrate streaming, a media library with asset versioning and access control, and global CDN delivery.
EWWW Image Optimizer is a WordPress plugin that compresses and optimizes JPG, PNG, GIF, and SVG images. It also converts images to WebP and automatically optimizes uploads.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the DAM category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Slovakia in the Image Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
