🆚 EWWW Image Optimizer vs. Smush
- 📈 Smush is noticeably more popular than EWWW Image Optimizer.
- 🌎 Smush is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Spain.
- 🌍 EWWW Image Optimizer is more popular in Japan, Germany, and France.
Type
About
EWWW Image Optimizer is a WordPress plugin that compresses and optimizes JPG, PNG, GIF, and SVG images, converts them to WebP, and automatically optimizes new uploads.
It supports lossless compression, lazy loading, automatic image resizing, thumbnail management, local server-based optimization without a third-party API, image backups, and optional CDN delivery.
Smush is a WordPress image optimization plugin that provides global CDN delivery, WebP and AVIF conversion, and critical LCP image preloading on Pro plans.
It compresses images on upload and in bulk, applies lazy loading and automatic resizing, detects incorrectly sized images, and supports directory and background optimization.
Headquarters
Pricing
(CDN, 50+ GB traffic) $36+/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Image Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
EWWW Image Optimizer

