🆚 Cuttly vs. EepURL
- 📈 EepURL is five times more popular than Cuttly.
- 🌎 EepURL is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 Cuttly is more popular in Indonesia, Thailand, and Turkey.
CuttlyType
About
Cuttly is a URL shortening and link management platform that provides branded short links, QR codes, microsites, and analytics tools.
The platform supports customizable redirect rules, link expiration, A/B redirects, UTM parameter management, editable QR codes, bio link pages, surveys and polls, and API access.
EepURL is a URL shortening and click tracking service created by 
Mailchimp for newsletters, signup forms, and campaign pages.
The service operates through the eepurl.com and mailchi.mp domains and supports customizable campaign URLs.
Headquarters
Pricing
(300 links) $12/month
(5K links) $25/month
(20K links) $99/month
(50K links) $149/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Cambodia in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Indonesia in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Turkey in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Ukraine in the URL Shorteners category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Thailand in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Netherlands in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the URL Shorteners category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Belgium in the URL Shorteners category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Bitly
TinyURL
Amzn.to
t.co
g.co🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.