🆚 EWWW Image Optimizer vs. NitroPack

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Image optimization tool
Performance technology

About

EWWW Image Optimizer is a WordPress plugin that compresses and optimizes JPG, PNG, GIF, and SVG images. It also converts images to WebP and automatically optimizes uploads.

NitroPack is a performance optimization solution for WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento, and OpenCart that offers caching, code, image, and font optimization, and a built-in CDN.

Headquarters

Glendive, Montana, United States
Sofia, Bulgaria

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Open source
Unlimited$8+/month
Free version ❌
$17.50+/month

Categories

Image Optimization › Rank #2
Image Optimization › Rank #3
WordPress Plugins › Rank #38
Performance › Rank #16
Caching › Rank #14

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The EWWW Image Optimizer tool is 1.6 times more popular than NitroPack.
Total websites

Market share

Image Optimization

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

EWWW Image Optimizer is more popular in Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while NitroPack is more popular in the United States, Australia, and India.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
Australia
France
Italy
Spain
Canada
India

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

EWWW Image Optimizer is more popular among sites focused on blogs and wiki, education and reference, and travel, while NitroPack is more commonly used on business, marketing and merchandising, and Internet services sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Health
Travel
Entertainment
Real Estate

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#2,367
#6,290
#7,210
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#3,042
#6,665
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.