🆚 EWWW Image Optimizer vs. QUIC.cloud
- 📈 EWWW Image Optimizer is much more popular than QUIC.cloud.
- 🌎 EWWW Image Optimizer is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany.
- 🌍 QUIC.cloud is more popular in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Barbados.
EWWW Image Optimizer
QUIC.cloudType
About
EWWW Image Optimizer is a 
WordPress plugin that compresses and optimizes JPG, PNG, GIF, and SVG images, converts them to WebP, and automatically optimizes new uploads.
It supports lossless compression, lazy loading, automatic image resizing, thumbnail management, local server-based optimization without a third-party API, image backups, and optional CDN delivery.
QUIC.cloud is a content delivery network and online service platform for WordPress developed by the team at 
LiteSpeed Technologies that provides HTTP/3 support, static and dynamic caching, and security features.
It operates as a reverse proxy across 70+ global points of presence, includes brute-force mitigation and DDoS protection, offers image and 
CSS optimization, and works exclusively with the LiteSpeed Cache for WordPress plugin.
Headquarters
Pricing
(78 CDN nodes)
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Turkey in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Poland in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Australia in the Image Optimization category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Image Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,813,555 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.