🆚 iMatrix vs. Pabau
- 📈 iMatrix is much more popular than Pabau.
- 🌎 iMatrix is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Australia.
- 🌍 Pabau is more popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Scheduling software
About
iMatrix provides advanced website and digital marketing solutions for small to medium-sized health and wellness practices.
Pabau is a clinic management software that integrates appointment scheduling and point of sale.
Headquarters
El Segundo, California, United States
Bedford, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ❌
Startup Package
(1 user, less than 100 clients)$69/month
(1 user, less than 100 clients)$69/month
Other plansCustom
Categories
CMS › Rank #35
Scheduling › Rank #7
Scheduling › Rank #88
EHR › Rank #1
EHR › Rank #14
CRM › Rank #61
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The iMatrix CMS is 83 times more popular than Pabau.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
EHR
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
iMatrix is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Australia, while Pabau is more popular in the United Kingdom.
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Australia
India
Netherlands
United Arab Emirates
France
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the EHR category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
iMatrix is more popular than Pabau in all market segments.
Health
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Fashion/Beauty
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.