🆚 Jitsi vs. Lark
- 📈 Jitsi is much more popular than Lark.
- 🌎 Jitsi is more popular in the United States, Spain, and Germany.
- 🌍 Lark is more popular in China, Vietnam, and Hong Kong.
Jitsi
LarkType
About
Jitsi is a set of open-source projects for secure video conferencing that includes components such as Jitsi Meet for web and mobile conferencing and Jitsi Videobridge for scalable media routing.
It is built on 
WebRTC standards and uses a selective forwarding architecture that relays audio and video streams without mixing, supports simulcast, bandwidth estimation, recording and streaming via Jibri (Jitsi Broadcasting Infrastructure), and SIP integration via Jigasi (Jitsi Gateway to SIP).
Lark, known as Feishu in the Chinese market, is an enterprise collaboration platform developed by ByteDance that integrates instant messaging, document collaboration, video conferencing, and calendar management.
It provides real-time translation for over 100 languages, video conferencing with in-call document co-editing, a no-code relational database for automated workflows, and a shared calendar displaying team schedules.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5 TB) $7.20/user/month
(15 TB) $14.40/user/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Video Conferencing category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Video Conferencing category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Video Conferencing category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Video Conferencing category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Video Conferencing category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Online Collaboration category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Video Conferencing category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in China in the Instant Messaging category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
ByteDance company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.