🆚 Logly Audience Analytics vs. Oracle BlueKai
- 📈 Oracle BlueKai is slightly more popular than Logly Audience Analytics.
- 🌎 Oracle BlueKai is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Logly Audience Analytics is more popular in Japan.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Data management platform
Data management platform
About
Logly Audience Analytics, formerly known as Juicer, is a data management platform from Japan.
Oracle BlueKai is a cloud-based data management platform that enables companies to personalize online, offline, and mobile marketing campaigns.
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️
JPY 50,000+/month
Free version ❌
Custom
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Oracle BlueKai DMP is 1.2 times more popular than Logly Audience Analytics.
Total websites
Market share
DMP
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Oracle BlueKai is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while Logly Audience Analytics is more popular in Japan.
Japan
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Brazil
Turkey
Spain
Canada
Peru
Australia
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the DMP category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Turkey in the DMP category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Brazil in the DMP category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the United States in the DMP category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Germany in the DMP category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Japan in the DMP category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Oracle BlueKai is more popular than Logly Audience Analytics in all market segments.
Business
General News
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Finance/Banking
Software/Hardware
Health
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Lotame