🆚 Knock vs. Placester

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Customer relationship management system
Website builder

About

Knock CRM is a web-based customer relationship and front-office platform designed for multifamily property managers and leasing teams.

It supports self-scheduling of tours, unified communication via email, SMS, voice, and chat, centralized lead and referral management across communities, and includes the AI Leasing Agent chatbot.

Placester is a WordPress-based website builder for real estate agents and teams, featuring 30 designer-crafted templates, an integrated CRM, live chat, and lead capture tools.

Headquarters

Richardson, Texas, United States
Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌
Custom
Free version ❌
For Agents
Agent Essential$59/month
Agent Plus$79/month
Agent Premier$129/month
Premier + Content$329/month
For Brokers & teams
Team$199/month
Broker Standard$399/month
Broker Plus$599/month

Categories

CRM › Rank #40
CRM › Rank #49
Live Chats › Rank #73
Website Builders › Rank #111

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Knock CRM system is 1.7 times more popular than Placester.
Total websites

Market share

CRM

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Knock is more popular than Placester in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Knock is more popular than Placester in all market segments.
Real Estate
General News

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#376,364
#512,165
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,254,572
#1,614,582
#2,036,366
#3,433,389
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.