🆚 Media.net vs. Raptive
- 📈 Raptive is twice as popular as Media.net.
- 🌎 Raptive is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 Media.net is more popular in Germany, Italy, and France.
Type
About
Media.net is an omnichannel supply-side platform that uses a proprietary contextual engine to deliver programmatic advertising without cookies or audience data.
It supports display, native, video, and text ad formats, provides search intent-based targeting, a unified control panel with AI-driven yield optimization, and exclusive demand from the Yahoo! Bing Contextual Ads Program, and integrates with LiveRamp and
Claritas.
Raptive is a premium ad management network that helps content publishers monetize their websites through optimized ad placements.
It provides custom ad layouts, multiple ad formats including display and video, and works with publishers that have quality content, a minimum of 25,000 monthly pageviews, and significant traffic from key English-speaking markets.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 37th most popular in France in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 38th most popular in the United States in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 38th most popular in Germany in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 38th most popular in Spain in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the United States in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Canada in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Advertising category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Media.net