🆚 Optimizely CMS vs. Orchard Core
- 📈 Optimizely CMS is much more popular than Orchard Core.
- 🌎 Optimizely CMS is more popular in Sweden, the United States, and Norway.
- 🌍 Orchard Core is more popular in the Czech Republic, Italy, and South Africa.
Optimizely CMSType
About
Optimizely CMS is a cloud-based content management system with enterprise-level features and headless delivery capabilities.
It offers a Visual Builder with drag-and-drop editing, reusable templates, an integrated Digital Asset Management (DAM) system, audience segmentation for personalized content delivery, and REST and 
GraphQL APIs for omnichannel content distribution.
Orchard Core is an open-source, modular content management system and application framework built on 
ASP.NET Core that allows multiple sites to run from a single installation and supports both traditional and headless content delivery.
It provides a plug-in architecture with customizable content types, site isolation within one instance, built-in REST and GraphQL APIs, media and multilingual management, and Liquid templating.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Sweden in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Finland in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Denmark in the CMS category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Craft
Storyblok
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Strapi🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.