🆚 Phorest vs. Timely
- 📈 Phorest is slightly more popular than Timely.
- 🌎 Phorest is more popular in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Ireland.
- 🌍 Timely is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Scheduling software
Scheduling software
About
Phorest is salon software for hair, beauty, barber & spa businesses.
Timely is a booking and client management software designed specifically for spas, salons and barbershops.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
Dunedin, New Zealand
Pricing
Free version ❌
On request
Free version ❌Free 14-day trial
$26+/month
Categories
Scheduling › Rank #40
Scheduling › Rank #43
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phorest scheduling software is 1.1 times more popular than Timely.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phorest is more popular in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Ireland, while Timely is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.
Australia
United Kingdom
United States
Ireland
New Zealand
Finland
Canada
Germany
France
Austria
Awards
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Scheduling category.
- ⬆️ 39th most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Australia in the Scheduling category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phorest is more popular among sites focused on fashion and beauty, and business, while Timely is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, online shopping, and health sites.
Fashion/Beauty
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Health
Business
Software/Hardware
Public Information
Entertainment
Sports
Recreation/Hobbies
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.