🆚 Booksy vs. Phorest
- 📈 Phorest is as popular as Booksy.
- 🌎 Phorest is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Ireland.
- 🌍 Booksy is more popular in Poland, Spain, and the Netherlands.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Scheduling software
Scheduling software
About
Booksy is a cloud-based appointment booking software for hairstylists, nail artists, barbers, braiders, estheticians, massage therapists, salons, and spas.
Phorest is salon software for hair, beauty, barber & spa businesses.
Headquarters
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Dublin, Ireland
Pricing
Free version ❌
$29.99/month
Free version ❌
On request
Categories
Scheduling › Rank #41
Scheduling › Rank #40
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phorest scheduling software is as popular as Booksy.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phorest is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Ireland, while Booksy is more popular in Poland, Spain, and the Netherlands.
Poland
United States
United Kingdom
Ireland
Australia
Finland
Spain
Canada
Germany
France
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Poland in the Scheduling category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Scheduling category.
- ⬆️ 39th most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phorest is more popular among sites focused on fashion and beauty, and marketing and merchandising, while Booksy is more commonly used on business, travel, and online shopping sites.
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Travel
Online Shopping
Health
Public Information
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.