🆚 Pixc vs. Smush
- 📈 Smush is much more popular than Pixc.
- 🌍 Smush is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
SmushType
Image optimization tool
Image optimization tool
About
Pixc is a photo editing service for e-commerce businesses that automatically resizes, optimizes, and crops product photos.
Smush is an image optimization plugin for 
WordPress that allows you to optimize and resize images, enable lazy loading, and compress media files in background mode.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Melbourne, Australia
Pricing
Pixc: Photo Resize for Shopify
Free version ✔️First 50 images free
$5+/month
Free version ✔️
Basic$36/year
Standard$60/year
Freelancer$120/year
Agency$240/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Smush image optimization tool is 11,180 times more popular than Pixc.
Total websites
Market share
Image Optimization
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Smush is more popular than Pixc in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Spain
Australia
Germany
Canada
Brazil
France
Netherlands
Italy
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Image Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Image Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Smush is more popular than Pixc in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Imgix
ImageKit🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.