🆚 Powr vs. ReviewTrackers

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Conversion optimization tool
Customer review platform

About

POWR is a suite of over 60 customizable, code-free website applications that include popups, image galleries, video sliders, social feed embeds, and customer reviews.

ReviewTrackers is an online reputation management software that allows monitoring of online reviews from over 100 review sites and platforms.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️
Form Builder$8.99+/month
Social Feed$4.94+/month
Poll$8.99+/month
Video Slider$4.04+/month
Other apps$4.94+/month
Free version ❌
$49+/month

Categories

Conversion Optimization › Rank #2
Conversion Optimization › Rank #106
Widgets › Rank #14
Customer Reviews › Rank #61
Feedback › Rank #58

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Powr conversion optimization tool is 73 times more popular than ReviewTrackers.
Total websites

Market share

Conversion Optimization

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Powr is more popular than ReviewTrackers in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
Australia
Canada
France
India
Switzerland
Italy

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Powr is more popular than ReviewTrackers in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Fashion/Beauty
Education/Reference
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Entertainment
Recreation/Hobbies
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#7,560
#7,898
#7,913
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#13,497
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.