🆚 Schema Pro vs. SmartCrawl
- 📈 SmartCrawl is slightly more popular than Schema Pro.
- 🌎 SmartCrawl is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 Schema Pro is more popular in Iran, Spain, and Vietnam.
Schema Pro
SmartCrawlType
About
Schema Pro is a 
WordPress plugin for adding and managing schema markup without writing code.
It supports more than 20 
JSON-LD schema types, automatically fills schema fields from page content and WordPress custom fields, and lets users control which pages or posts receive each schema using inclusion and exclusion rules.
SmartCrawl is a WordPress SEO plugin that analyzes content and automates on-page optimization to improve search visibility and indexing.
It provides real-time content and keyword analysis, automatic 
XML sitemap generation, customizable meta titles and descriptions, schema markup with a schema builder, and tools such as 301 redirects, breadcrumbs, and social metadata including 
Open Graph and 
Twitter Cards.
Headquarters
wpmudev.comPricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Iran in the SEO category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Vietnam in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Spain in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United States in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in France in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Switzerland in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in South Africa in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Brazil in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in the Czech Republic in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United Kingdom in the SEO category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,619,357 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.