🆚 A-Frame vs. Phaser
- 📈 Phaser is noticeably more popular than A-Frame.
- 🌎 Phaser is more popular in the United States, the Netherlands, and Spain.
- 🌍 A-Frame is more popular in Japan, Switzerland, and Italy.
Statistics based on 3.9M+ analyzed websites. About this data
A-Frame
PhaserType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
A-Frame is a web framework for building 3D/augmented/virtual reality experiences.
Canvas
WebGL
HTML5Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free version ✔️ Open source
Developer License (+ Visual Editor + 1 GB Asset Storage + Email support) $10/month
Professional License (+ Playable Ads Project Templates + Phaser Compressor + 100 GB Asset Storage) $45/month
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #298
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #291
Animation › Rank #30
Animation › Rank #28
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phaser JavaScript library is 1.8 times more popular than A-Frame.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Animation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phaser is more popular in the United States, the Netherlands, and Spain, while A-Frame is more popular in Japan, Switzerland, and Italy.
United States
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
France
Japan
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Italy
Russia
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phaser is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and software and hardware, while A-Frame is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, and education and reference sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Interactive Web Applications
Finance/Banking
Games
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,976,354 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.