🆚 e-GMS vs. JSON-LD
- 📈 JSON-LD is much more popular than e-GMS.
- 🌍 JSON-LD is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ e-GMS is particularly popular in the United Kingdom.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Semantic markup technology
Semantic markup technology
About
e-GMS, the UK e-Government Metadata Standard, published by Cabinet Office, is a definition of the metadata elements that should be applied to public sector information assets.
JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data (JSON-LD) is a lightweight linked data format used to embed structured data into web pages.
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Categories
Semantic Markup › Rank #14
Semantic Markup › Rank #4
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
JSON-LD semantic markup technology is 30,895 times more popular than e-GMS.
Total websites
Market share
Semantic Markup
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
JSON-LD is more popular than e-GMS in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Japan
Spain
Netherlands
Italy
Australia
India
Awards
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in France in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Spain in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Italy in the Semantic Markup category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
JSON-LD is more popular than e-GMS in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Entertainment
Health
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Open Graph
Twitter Cards
SearchAction