🆚 Fresha vs. Treatwell
- 📈 Fresha is slightly more popular than Treatwell.
- 🌎 Fresha is more popular in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States.
- 🌍 Treatwell is more popular in Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Scheduling software
Scheduling software
About
Fresha is an appointment booking software that mainly focuses on the beauty and wellness sector.
Treatwell is a beauty booking platform that puts customers and salon managers in control.
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
London, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free version ✔️
Marketplace New Client Fee20%
Commission35% on first bookings from their marketplace
Online prepayments2.5% processing fee
Categories
Scheduling › Rank #46
Scheduling › Rank #51
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Fresha scheduling software is 1.2 times more popular than Treatwell.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Fresha is more popular in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States, while Treatwell is more popular in Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.
United Kingdom
Australia
Germany
United States
Netherlands
Spain
Canada
France
Switzerland
Lithuania
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in Australia in the Scheduling category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Scheduling category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Fresha is more popular among sites focused on travel, while Treatwell is more commonly used on fashion and beauty, business, and marketing and merchandising sites.
Fashion/Beauty
Travel
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Recreation/Hobbies
Public Information
Software/Hardware
Restaurants
Dating/Personals
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.