🆚 Fresha vs. YClients
- 📈 YClients is noticeably more popular than Fresha.
- 🌍 YClients is more popular in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.
- 🌎 Fresha is more popular in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Scheduling software
Scheduling software
About
Fresha is an appointment booking software that mainly focuses on the beauty and wellness sector.
YClients is a Russian cloud-based scheduling and business management software for beauty, wellness and healthcare businesses.
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Moscow, Russia
Pricing
Free version ✔️
Marketplace New Client Fee20%
1,000- RUB/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The YClients scheduling software is 1.4 times more popular than Fresha.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
YClients is more popular in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, while Fresha is more popular in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Russia
Australia
United Kingdom
United States
Canada
Ukraine
Belarus
New Zealand
United Arab Emirates
Ireland
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in Australia in the Scheduling category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Scheduling category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Scheduling category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Russia in the CRM category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
YClients is more popular among sites focused on business, recreation and hobbies, and marketing and merchandising, while Fresha is more commonly used on fashion and beauty, and travel sites.
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Travel
Recreation/Hobbies
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Health
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.