🆚 Jetpack Stats vs. Tinybird
- 📈 Jetpack Stats is much more popular than Tinybird.
- 🌍 Jetpack Stats is more popular in all countries.
Jetpack StatsType
About
Jetpack Stats is a 
WordPress analytics tool that provides traffic and engagement data directly within the WordPress dashboard.
It tracks daily and monthly visitors, page views, referrers, top posts and pages, outbound link clicks, video plays, downloads, search terms, author-level performance, and allows exporting reports as CSV for further analysis.
Tinybird is a managed, serverless, real-time analytics backend service built on ClickHouse that helps developers collect, process, and share data through APIs.
It allows fast querying of large datasets, streams data from multiple sources, automatically creates secure API endpoints, and offers Git/CI-friendly workflows.
Headquarters
Pricing
(10K pageviews)$239.4/year
(100K pageviews)$599.4/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Analytics category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Analytics category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Analytics category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Netherlands in the Analytics category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in South Africa in the Analytics category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the BI category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the BI category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the BI category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the BI category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United Kingdom in the BI category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
MonsterInsights
Independent Analytics
Power BI
Looker Studio
Amazon QuickSight🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,370,405 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.