🆚 LoopMe vs. Microsoft Invest
- 📈 Microsoft Invest is much more popular than LoopMe.
- 🌍 Microsoft Invest is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ LoopMe is particularly popular in Turkey.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
LoopMe
Microsoft InvestType
Advertising technology
Advertising technology
About
LoopMe is a programmatic advertising platform that uses AI to improve advertising performance.
Microsoft Invest is a a demand side ad management platform with full buy-side capabilities.
Headquarters
Redmond, Washington, United States
Categories
Advertising › Rank #107
Advertising › Rank #15
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Microsoft Invest advertising technology is 21 times more popular than LoopMe.
Total websites
Market share
Advertising
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Microsoft Invest is more popular than LoopMe in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Turkey
Germany
France
Spain
Australia
Netherlands
Italy
Brazil
Awards
- ⬆️ 44th most popular in Turkey in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 76th most popular in Germany in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in the United States in the Advertising category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Finland in the Advertising category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Norway in the Advertising category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in France in the Advertising category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Turkey in the Advertising category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the Netherlands in the Advertising category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Microsoft Invest is more popular than LoopMe in all market segments.
Business
General News
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Finance/Banking
Entertainment
Travel
Fashion/Beauty
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Criteo
The Trade Desk
AdRoll
Magnite🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.