🆚 Material Design Lite vs. MudBlazor
- 📈 Material Design Lite is much more popular than MudBlazor.
- 🌍 Material Design Lite is more popular in all countries.
Material Design Lite
MudBlazorType
About
Material Design Lite (MDL) is a legacy user interface framework that implements 
Material Design components using plain 
CSS, 
JavaScript, and 
HTML without external dependencies.
It provides a set of ready-made UI components, such as buttons, layouts, cards, menus, sliders, and dialogs, a responsive grid system, and automatic component upgrading via JavaScript.
MudBlazor is an open-source 
Blazor component library based on Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in 
C#.
It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and 
WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal JavaScript dependency.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 11st most popular in Spain in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Vietnam in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Ukraine in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Italy in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Japan in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Materialize
Material UI
Angular Material
AngularJS Material
Bootstrap
Tailwind CSS
Radzen Blazor
BlazorBootstrap
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,512,920 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.