🆚 Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service vs. Web Vitals
- 📈 Web Vitals is much more popular than Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service.
- 🌎 Web Vitals is more popular in the United States, Indonesia, and Brazil.
- 🌍 Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service is more popular in Korea, Costa Rica, and Qatar.
Type
About
Oracle Dynamic Monitoring Service (DMS) is a library that enables application and system developers to use a variety of DMS sensors to measure and export customized performance metrics for specific software components.
The Web Vitals library is a lightweight JavaScript library for measuring Core Web Vitals and related performance metrics on real users in the browser.
It is a modular package of about 2 KB that exposes functions for metrics such as CLS, LCP, INP, FCP, and TTFB, uses the PerformanceObserver API with buffered entries to capture data even after page load, and supports integration with Google Analytics and
Google Tag Manager.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Korea in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Vietnam in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Spain in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Argentina in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Cambodia in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Indonesia in the SEO category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Argentina in the SEO category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,009 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Datadog
DebugBear