🆚 Schema & Structured Data vs. SEOmatic
- 📈 Schema & Structured Data is noticeably more popular than SEOmatic.
- 🌎 Schema & Structured Data is more popular in the United States, France, and Germany.
- 🌍 SEOmatic is more popular in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands.
Schema & Structured Data
SEOmaticType
About
Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP is a 
WordPress plugin that adds Schema.org structured data and Google Rich Snippets markup to websites.
It supports more than 15 schema types, conditional rules for applying markup to specific pages, Google review markup, custom post types, and integrations with 
WooCommerce and 
bbPress.
SEOmatic is an SEO plugin for 
Craft CMS that manages search and social metadata, structured data, sitemaps, and crawler directives.
It generates 
HTML meta tags, 
JSON-LD structured data, 
Twitter Cards, 
Open Graph tags, 
XML sitemaps, and robots.txt, provides SEO controls and previews for individual entries, and supports Craft multisite and headless setups.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 site, 50 reviews) $99/year
(1 sites, 150 reviews) $149/year
(25 sites, 250 reviews) $299/year
(unlmited sites, 500 reviews) $499/year
(unlmited sites, 500 reviews) $999
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Italy in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Brazil in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Belgium in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the Netherlands in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Norway in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Austria in the SEO category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in New Zealand in the SEO category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,629,123 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.