🆚 Brotli vs. Deflate
- 📈 Brotli is much more popular than Deflate.
- 🌍 Brotli is more popular in all countries.
Type
About
Brotli is a lossless compression algorithm developed by Google that uses LZ77, Huffman coding, and context modeling to achieve higher data density than
Gzip for web content.
It is widely supported by modern browsers and servers, is optimized for text-based assets such as HTML,
CSS,
JavaScript, and fonts, and typically delivers smaller file sizes than gzip while maintaining fast decompression speeds.
Deflate is a lossless data compression algorithm that combines the LZ77 sliding window technique with Huffman coding to reduce data size efficiently.
It compresses data by replacing repeated byte sequences with references and encoding symbols with variable-length codes, forming the basis of formats such as
Gzip and Zlib, typically achieving size reductions comparable to 50 to 70 percent for text-based content.
Headquarters
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Compression category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Compression category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Compression category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Compression category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Compression category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United States in the Compression category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the United Kingdom in the Compression category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Compression category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Australia in the Compression category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Czech Republic in the Compression category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
