🆚 Cal.com vs. Phorest

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Scheduling software solution
Scheduling software solution

About

Cal.com is a scheduling platform for managing appointments and meetings, built as an open-source alternative to tools like Calendly.

It supports multi-calendar integration, rule-based availability and booking logic, automated reminders, customizable booking forms, built-in video conferencing (Cal Video), Stripe payments, RESTful APIs, and white-labeling.

Phorest is salon software for hair, beauty, barber & spa businesses.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States
Dublin, Ireland

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️1 user
Teams$15+/user/month
Organizations$37+/user/month
Free version ❌
On request

Categories

Scheduling › Rank #3
Scheduling › Rank #40

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Cal.com scheduling software solution is 22 times more popular than Phorest.
Total websites

Market share

Scheduling

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Cal.com is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while Phorest is more popular in Ireland and Finland.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Australia
Brazil
Italy
Canada
France
Netherlands
Ireland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Cal.com is more popular among sites focused on marketing and merchandising, business, and Internet services, while Phorest is more commonly used on fashion and beauty sites.
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Internet Services
Travel
Real Estate
Sports
Health
Online Shopping
Restaurants
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#12,785
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#11,735
#431,491
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.