🆚 Calendly vs. Squire
- 📈 Calendly is much more popular than Squire.
- 🌍 Calendly is more popular in all countries.
Calendly
SquireType
About
Calendly is a cloud-based scheduling platform that automates meeting booking by syncing calendars and sharing availability through booking links.
It supports configurable availability rules with buffers and limits, one-on-one, group, and round-robin scheduling, meeting polls, automated email and SMS reminders, and real-time syncing with connected calendars to prevent conflicts.
Squire is a booking, payment, and business management platform built specifically for barbershops.
It features branded mobile booking apps, 
Instagram and 
Reserve with Google integration, same-day payment deposits, waitlists that automatically fill canceled appointments, front-desk kiosks for walk-ins and upsells, and integrated banking and payment tools.
Headquarters
Pricing
(+ 6 calendars per user, HubSpot, Stripe, Paypal) $12/seat/month
(+ round-robin meetings, SSO, Salesforce, Marketo) $20/seat/month
(+ Microsoft Dynamics, SSO & SAML) $15,000+/year
(individual barbers) $30/month
(single-location shops) $50/month
(multi-location shops) $150/month
(established brands) $250/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Scheduling category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Scheduling category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Scheduling category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Scheduling category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.