🆚 Honeybadger vs. Web Vitals
- 📈 Web Vitals is much more popular than Honeybadger.
- 🌍 Web Vitals is more popular in all countries.
Honeybadger
Web VitalsType
About
Honeybadger is a full-stack application monitoring and error tracking platform that helps developers detect, analyze, and resolve issues in web applications.
It provides real-time error alerts with stack traces and contextual data, intelligent error grouping to reduce noise, structured log management with searchable queries, application performance monitoring dashboards, uptime checks from multiple locations, cron job monitoring, and automatically updated public status pages.
The Web Vitals library is a lightweight 
JavaScript library for measuring Core Web Vitals and related performance metrics on real users in the browser.
It is a modular package of about 2 KB that exposes functions for metrics such as CLS, LCP, INP, FCP, and TTFB, uses the PerformanceObserver API with buffered entries to capture data even after page load, and supports integration with 
Google Analytics and 
Google Tag Manager.
Headquarters
GitHubPricing
(50K errors)$26+/month
(50K errors, unlimited teams)$8+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Argentina in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Cambodia in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Indonesia in the SEO category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Argentina in the SEO category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Sentry
Bugsnag
Rollbar
TrackJS
Akamai mPulse
Datadog
SpeedCurve
DebugBear
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.