🆚 Microformats2 vs. oEmbed
- 📈 oEmbed is much more popular than Microformats2.
- 🌎 oEmbed is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Microformats2 is more popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Type
About
Microformats2 is the second generation of the Microformats specification designed to make publishing and parsing structured data in
HTML easier for both authors and developers.
It introduces a simplified class naming system, supports formats including h-card, h-entry, h-event, and h-product, provides built-in JSON parsing models, and improves backward compatibility and extensibility.
oEmbed is an open format that allows websites to embed representations of external URLs such as videos, images, and posts from third-party services.
It defines a simple API that returns structured metadata in JSON or
XML for generating content previews, and supports multiple content types including video, photo, link, and rich embeds.
Headquarters
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the United Kingdom in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Japan in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Vietnam in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Canada in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in El Salvador in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Zimbabwe in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Jamaica in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Zambia in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Ethiopia in the Semantic Markup category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Open Graph
Twitter Cards
JSON-LD
SearchAction