🆚 Phorest vs. Treatwell
- 📈 Phorest is noticeably more popular than Treatwell.
- 🌎 Phorest is more popular in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Ireland.
- 🌍 Treatwell is more popular in Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Appointment scheduling software
Appointment scheduling software
About
Phorest is an Irish salon management platform for hair, beauty, barber, spa, and aesthetic clinic businesses that combines appointment scheduling, POS, marketing, and customer management tools.
It provides online booking with deposits, integrated PhorestPay payment processing and card terminals, inventory tracking, and multi-location staff management for salons and clinics.
Treatwell is a beauty booking platform that puts customers and salon managers in control.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
London, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Commission 35% on first bookings from their marketplace
Online prepayments 2.5% processing fee
Categories
Scheduling › Rank #41
Scheduling › Rank #56
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phorest scheduling software is 1.5 times more popular than Treatwell.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phorest is more popular in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Ireland, while Treatwell is more popular in Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.
United Kingdom
United States
Germany
Ireland
Australia
Netherlands
Spain
Finland
France
Switzerland
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phorest is more popular than Treatwell in all market segments.
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Public Information
Software/Hardware
Entertainment
Sports
Recreation/Hobbies
Travel
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Phorest
Fresha
Acuity Scheduling
Vagaro