🆚 Criteo vs. StackAdapt

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Advertising technology
Advertising technology

About

Criteo is a French performance advertising platform focused on commerce media and retargeting.

Its AI-driven technology offers dynamic creative optimization (DCO+) to personalize ads in real time, predictive bidding based on shopper intent, a self-service ad platform for full-funnel campaign management, and a supply-side platform called Commerce Grid.

StackAdapt is a multi-channel programmatic advertising platform specializing in native, display, video, connected TV, audio, in-game, and DOOH advertising.

Headquarters

Paris, France
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Website

Categories

Advertising › Rank #9
Advertising › Rank #38

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Criteo advertising technology is 6 times more popular than StackAdapt.
Total websites

Market share

Advertising

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Criteo is more popular in the United States, France, and Korea, while StackAdapt is more popular in Canada and Gibraltar.
United States
France
Korea
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
Italy
Turkey
Spain
Poland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Criteo is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, blogs and wiki, and marketing and merchandising, while StackAdapt is more commonly used on finance and banking, and health sites.
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Fashion/Beauty
General News
Travel
Entertainment
Sports
Real Estate

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.