🆚 JD vs. Lazada

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Online marketplace
Online marketplace

About

JD.com is a large Chinese business-to-consumer marketplace.

Lazada is an Asian e-commerce platform that operates in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

It offers integrated digital payments including Lazada Wallet and local options, end-to-end logistics and fulfillment services through its Lazada Express network, premium LazMall flagship stores with authenticity guarantees and returns, and seller tools for inventory and sales management.

Headquarters

Beijing, China
Singapore

Website

Categories

Marketplaces › Rank #11
Marketplaces › Rank #2

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Lazada marketplace is 3 times more popular than JD.
Total websites

Market share

Marketplaces

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Lazada is more popular in Indonesia, the United States, and Vietnam, while JD is more popular in China, Hong Kong, and Korea.
Indonesia
China
United States
Vietnam
Thailand
Singapore
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Philippines
United Kingdom

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Lazada is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, marketing and merchandising, and blogs and wiki, while JD is more commonly used on business, portal sites, and finance and banking sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Portal Sites
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,266
#11,842
#14,162
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.