🆚 CiviCRM vs. HighLevel
- 📈 HighLevel is three times more popular than CiviCRM.
- 🌎 HighLevel is more popular in the United States, Australia, and India.
- 🌍 CiviCRM is more popular in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Taiwan.
Type
About
CiviCRM is a web-based constituent relationship management system built by and for nonprofit organizations and NGO's.
HighLevel is an all-in-one marketing and sales platform built for agencies, marketers, and service businesses to capture leads, automate campaigns, manage pipelines, and communicate with clients from a single dashboard.
It combines CRM and pipeline management, multi-channel marketing automation for email, SMS and social messaging, drag-and-drop website, landing page and funnel builders, appointment scheduling with reminders, reputation management, analytics and reporting, and white-label and SaaS modes that let agencies brand and resell its tools.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the Marketing Automation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the CRM category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CRM category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Canada in the CRM category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Canada in the Marketing Automation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Australia in the CRM category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Australia in the Page Builders category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in Canada in the Marketing Automation category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Page Builders category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in Australia in the Marketing Automation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Brevo
Keap
Groove.cm
Kajabi🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.