🆚 Fathom vs. Koko Analytics
- 📈 Fathom is five times more popular than Koko Analytics.
- 🌎 Fathom is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌎 Koko Analytics is more popular in Brazil, Poland, and Japan.
Fathom
Koko AnalyticsType
About
Fathom is a privacy-first website analytics solution that provides real-time traffic metrics with compliance with GDPR, CCPA, ePrivacy, and PECR, while filtering out bots, scrapers, and spam traffic.
It offers lightweight, cookieless analytics with accurate human visitor data, an intuitive dashboard with real-time metrics, custom event and UTM campaign tracking, unlimited data retention, email reporting and API access, and an open-source self-hosted Lite version.
Koko Analytics is a privacy-focused and lightweight analytics plugin for 
WordPress that provides self-hosted website statistics.
It tracks page views, referrers, and visitor activity using an optional cookieless measurement, supports cached pages, and uses a tracking script smaller than 1 KB.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Thailand in the Analytics category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Norway in the Analytics category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Belgium in the Analytics category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Ireland in the Analytics category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Analytics category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in Germany in the Analytics category.
- ⬆️ 45th most popular in Canada in the Analytics category.
- ⬆️ 70th most popular in Germany in the WordPress Plugins category.
- ⬆️ 102nd most popular in Canada in the WordPress Plugins category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.