🆚 oEmbed vs. RDFa
- 📈 oEmbed is much more popular than RDFa.
- 🌍 oEmbed is more popular in all countries.
Type
About
oEmbed is an open format that allows websites to embed representations of external URLs such as videos, images, and posts from third-party services.
It defines a simple API that returns structured metadata in JSON or
XML for generating content previews, and supports multiple content types including video, photo, link, and rich embeds.
RDFa (Resource Description Framework in Attributes) is an extension to HTML5 that embeds structured metadata within page content by adding attributes based on the RDF data model.
It uses HTML attributes such as vocab, typeof, and property to describe entities like people, places, events, recipes, and reviews, supports multiple vocabularies such as Schema.org,
Dublin Core, and
GoodRelations, and is one of the structured data formats supported by Google alongside
JSON-LD and Microdata.
Headquarters
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Uganda in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in El Salvador in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Zimbabwe in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Jamaica in the Semantic Markup category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Zambia in the Semantic Markup category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Belgium in the Semantic Markup category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Nepal in the Semantic Markup category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Saudi Arabia in the Semantic Markup category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Tunisia in the Semantic Markup category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Jordan in the Semantic Markup category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

Open Graph
Twitter Cards
SearchAction