🆚 Adobe Advertising vs. The Trade Desk

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Advertising technology
Advertising technology

About

Adobe Advertising is a cross-channel platform that offers brands the ability to plan, buy, manage, measure, analyze and optimize display, video, native, mobile, audio, search and connected TV advertising campaigns.

The Trade Desk is a programmatic demand-side platform that helps marketers reach their audiences across channels using data.

Headquarters

San Jose, California, United States
Ventura, California, United States

Website

Categories

Advertising › Rank #14
Advertising › Rank #16

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Adobe Advertising technology is 1.2 times more popular than The Trade Desk.
Total websites

Market share

Advertising

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Adobe Advertising is more popular in the United Kingdom, Germany, and the Netherlands, while The Trade Desk is more popular in the United States, Australia, and Canada.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Australia
France
Canada
Italy
Spain
Switzerland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Adobe Advertising is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, marketing and merchandising, and fashion and beauty, while The Trade Desk is more commonly used on business, finance and banking, and health sites.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Finance/Banking
Health
Education/Reference
Travel
Software/Hardware
Entertainment

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#406
#1,122
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.