🆚 BDOW! vs. OptiMonk
- 📈 BDOW! is noticeably more popular than OptiMonk.
- 🌎 BDOW! is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 OptiMonk is more popular in Hungary, Romania, and the Czech Republic.
BDOW!Type
About
BDOW! (formerly Sumo) is a website pop-up and form tool for building engaged email lists using overlays, embedded forms, and other list-gathering widgets.
It supports customizable pop-ups and slide-ins, exit-intent triggers, form embedding, A/B testing, basic analytics for conversions and subscriber growth, and integrations with 
WooCommerce, Mailchimp, 
Klaviyo, 
ActiveCampaign, HubSpot, and other platforms.
OptiMonk is a conversion rate optimization tool that provides popups, gamification widgets, website personalization, and A/B testing.
Headquarters
Pricing
(99 emails)$15/month
(6,000 emails)$25/month
(10,000 emails)$49/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the Conversion Optimization category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Poland in the Conversion Optimization category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Romania in the Conversion Optimization category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United States in the Conversion Optimization category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in India in the Email Marketing category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Hungary in the Conversion Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Hungary in the A/B Testing category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Romania in the A/B Testing category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Romania in the Conversion Optimization category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in India in the A/B Testing category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
OptinMonster
Privy
Sleeknote🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.