🆚 Acquia vs. Jitsu
- 📈 Acquia is much more popular than Jitsu.
- 🌍 Acquia is more popular in all countries.
Acquia
JitsuType
About
Acquia is a digital experience platform (DXP) that helps organizations build, manage, and optimize websites, applications, and content-rich digital experiences.
It includes a content management system built on 
Drupal, a customer data platform with personalization and behavior-based segmentation, marketing automation and campaign tools, multi-site and multi-domain management, and integration-ready APIs for extensibility.
Jitsu is an open-source customer data platform that collects events from websites, applications, and servers and delivers them to data warehouses and other analytics tools.
It provides SDKs, an HTTP API, and a 
Segment-compatible proxy for event collection, automatic identity graph and profile building, and delivery to destinations such as ClickHouse, BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift, 
Postgres, and 
S3.
Headquarters
Pricing
(2M events) $99/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Brazil in the Marketing Automation category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Brazil in the CDP category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Personalization category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the Personalization category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Spain in the CDP category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.