🆚 Magnite vs. StackAdapt

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Advertising technology
Advertising technology

About

Magnite is an omnichannel supply-side and CTV/video advertising platform formed in 2020 through the merger of Rubicon Project and Telaria.

It combines Rubicon's programmatic exchange capability with Telaria's connected-TV expertise to enable publishers to monetize across CTV, display, video, mobile, and audio formats.

StackAdapt is a multi-channel programmatic advertising platform specializing in native, display, video, connected TV, audio, in-game, and DOOH advertising.

Headquarters

New York, United States
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Website

Categories

Advertising › Rank #21
Advertising › Rank #38

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Magnite advertising technology is 2 times more popular than StackAdapt.
Total websites

Market share

Advertising

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Magnite is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, while StackAdapt is more popular in Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore.
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Turkey
Germany
France
Australia
Italy
Spain
Japan

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Magnite is more popular among sites focused on general news, online shopping, and sports, while StackAdapt is more commonly used on business, finance and banking, and health sites.
General News
Business
Online Shopping
Sports
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Finance/Banking
Fashion/Beauty
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.