🆚 Collect.chat vs. LivePerson

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Live chat software solution
Live chat software solution

About

Collect.chat is an interactive chatbot platform that allows website owners to create automated conversational forms without coding.

It features a drag-and-drop builder, multiple question-type templates, widget or full-page bot options, supports conditional logic, over 180 languages, and integrates with webhooks and analytics tools.

LivePerson's Conversational Cloud is an AI-powered conversational platform that connects brands to consumers through popular channels, such as Web Messaging, Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp, and can scale to any number of conversations.

Headquarters

Newark, Delaware, United States
New York, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️50 responses per month
Lite
(500 responses)
$24/month
Standard
(2.5K responses)
$49/month
Plus
(5K responses)
$99/month
Unlimited$299/month
Free version ❌
Custom

Categories

Live Chats › Rank #35
Live Chats › Rank #26
Scheduling › Rank #14

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The LivePerson software solution is 1.8 times more popular than Collect.chat.
Total websites

Market share

Live Chats

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

LivePerson is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, while Collect.chat is more popular in India, Spain, and the United Arab Emirates.
United States
United Kingdom
India
Australia
Germany
Canada
France
Spain
Ireland
United Arab Emirates

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

LivePerson is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and finance and banking, while Collect.chat is more commonly used on Internet services sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Internet Services
Health
Education/Reference
Travel
Real Estate

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#7,948
#13,236
#30,795
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#455
#1,053
#1,387
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.