🆚 Google Interactive Media Ads vs. Magnite

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Advertising technology
Advertising technology

About

Google Interactive Media Ads (IMA) enable publishers to request ads from any VAST-compliant ad server and manage ad playback.

Magnite is an omnichannel supply-side and CTV/video advertising platform formed in 2020 through the merger of Rubicon Project and Telaria.

It combines Rubicon's programmatic exchange capability with Telaria's connected-TV expertise to enable publishers to monetize across CTV, display, video, mobile, and audio formats.

Headquarters

Mountain View, California, United States
New York, United States

Website

Categories

Advertising › Rank #44
Advertising › Rank #21
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #190

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Magnite advertising technology is 2.7 times more popular than Google Interactive Media Ads.
Total websites

Market share

Advertising

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Magnite is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Turkey, while Google Interactive Media Ads is more popular in Italy, Vietnam, and Portugal.
United States
United Kingdom
Turkey
Italy
Germany
France
Canada
Spain
Brazil
Poland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Magnite is more popular among sites focused on general news, sports, and online shopping, while Google Interactive Media Ads is more commonly used on entertainment, games, and Internet radio and TV sites.
General News
Sports
Entertainment
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Games
Finance/Banking

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.